****
In the 1700s, Dido Elizabeth
Belle is brought to live with in England. She is the illegitimate child of a
Royal Navy Captain and a slave, but her great-aunt and uncle decide to take her
in. She is raised amongst the aristocracy alongside her cousin, Elizabeth,
receiving the same education and care. However, her colour prevents her from
being fully accepted into society, regardless of her position as an heiress.
Alongside her journey of self-discovery is the Zong case, over which her
great-uncle is presiding, the outcome of which will effect Britain’s involvement
in the slave trade.
This is a beautiful and heart-felt
period drama which deals with both a pivotal court case and a love story.
Comparisons have been made to Jane Austen when it comes to the love triangle,
and indeed the excellent script (written by Misan Sagay) displays the same elegant
command of the English language as her books, but I would suggest that this
film has slightly more ‘bite’ than you would initially expect. Yes, there are
lovely houses and furnishings, and marriage proposals, and men turning out to
be not as they first seemed, but the slavery angle looms over everything and
elevates it above a simple period romance. Gugu Mbatha-Raw plays Dido in an
incredibly emotive performance, her large eyes and nuanced hand movements
informing the audience of her intense, and sometimes confused, emotions from
the beginning. Dido is a very rich character, and it would have been easy to
make her too emotional, but Mbatha-Raw commands the screen with great skill,
and really makes us feel for Dido, even though her situation is completely
alien to us. Tom Wilkinson provides the other stand-out performance as Dido’s
great-uncle, Lord Mansfield, who is overseeing the Zong case. The interplay
between Wilkinson and Mbatha-Raw is a joy to behold, and Wilkinson capably
gives Mansfield depth as he weighs up the differing arguments in the difficult
court case.
Whilst Wilkinson and Mbatha-Raw are
undoubtedly the stars of the film, the supporting cast are equally as
impressive. Tom Felton is odious and repulsive as the racist James Ashford,
speaking some of the most upsetting lines of the entire film, whilst Penelope
Wilton and Emily Watson play the maternal figures in Dido’s life, interplaying
humour with sensitivity, and boasting a fantastic wardrobe. The costumes are
fabulous and there is a great level of period detail on screen, making it
visually enticing throughout. The film is exquisitely shot, framing the close-ups
well, alongside lovely landscape scenes. The score, using pre-existing
classical pieces alongside new pieces, is well judged, although there is a
scene wherein Davinier appeals to Mansfield through a coach window where I felt
the music was perhaps being overly manipulative – we, as the audience, know the
gravity of the situation without requiring the music to tell us. One could
accuse the film of being overly sentimental and an unashamed ‘weepy’ but I
would disagree with this as we still feel the pain and trauma of the slave
trade through Dido. It is true that we never see any violence or the hardships
of slavery, but the discussions of what happened to the ‘jettisoned cargo’ of
the Zong is hard-hitting enough to send a shiver down the spine without having
to actually see the incident occur.
After the horrors of 12 Years a Slave, some believed that an
effective film about slavery could not be made again, but Belle proves this wrong. It is true there is no explicit violence
or hardship on display, but by following the impact of slavery in the life of
one individual, we are exposed to the same traumas that 12 Years a Slave exposed. The two films chose to address the issue
from very different angles, but Belle should
not be dismissed simply because it does not take place on a cotton farm.
Comments
Post a Comment